Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323045: fixed in libgetenv-java 1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 11:55:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 04:55:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d009010.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.9.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4H5N-0005BL-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 04:55:30 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E4H5K-0007mb-IZ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:55:27 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgetenv-java: FTBFS (amd64): uk_co_tigress_System.o: relocation 
R_X86_64_PC32 against `getenv@@GLIBC_2.2.5' can not be used when making a 
shared object; recompile with -fPIC
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:55:27 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libgetenv-java
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'libgetenv-java' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

jikes-gij uk/co/tigress/System.java
fastjar -c -f libgetenv-java.jar uk/co/tigress/*.class
gcc -c -g -Wall -O2 uk_co_tigress_System.c
gcc -shared -fPIC -o libgetenv-java.so uk_co_tigress_System.o
/usr/bin/ld: uk_co_tigress_System.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against 
`getenv@@GLIBC_2.2.5' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile 
with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

With the attached patch 'libgetenv-java' can be compiled on amd64.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libgetenv-java-1.0/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libgetenv-java-1.0/debian/rules 2005-08-14 10:59:56.000000000 
+0000
+++ ./debian/rules      2005-08-14 10:59:45.000000000 +0000
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
        dh_testdir
        jikes-gij uk/co/tigress/System.java
        fastjar -c -f libgetenv-java.jar uk/co/tigress/*.class
-       gcc -c -g -Wall -O2 uk_co_tigress_System.c
+       gcc -c -fPIC -g -Wall -O2 uk_co_tigress_System.c
        gcc -shared -fPIC -o libgetenv-java.so uk_co_tigress_System.o
        touch build-stamp
 

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323045-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 13:49:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 06:49:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E4IpO-00045e-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:47:06 -0700
From: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#323045: fixed in libgetenv-java 1.0-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:47:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libgetenv-java
Source-Version: 1.0-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgetenv-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgetenv-java_1.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libgetenv-java/libgetenv-java_1.0-4.diff.gz
libgetenv-java_1.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libgetenv-java/libgetenv-java_1.0-4.dsc
libgetenv-java_1.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgetenv-java/libgetenv-java_1.0-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libgetenv-java package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:35:18 +0100
Source: libgetenv-java
Binary: libgetenv-java
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libgetenv-java - Java library for obtaining environment variables
Closes: 323045
Changes: 
 libgetenv-java (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * amd64 FTBFS fixes thanks to Andreas Jochens. Closes: #323045
   * Updated build depends
   * Updated policy version. No changes.
Files: 
 77c6c82fa443a5ee2abf0bec0aecf443 622 libs optional libgetenv-java_1.0-4.dsc
 85a422ca12c109c928c1a0d03b62c38c 1666 libs optional 
libgetenv-java_1.0-4.diff.gz
 2ff5229c6470003e711c1f9c023a90a5 3890 libs optional 
libgetenv-java_1.0-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC/0mSRIB09ZZvujwRAuVpAKDeYbcs8+OuCwcP0mWa4lcD/PflIwCdFO2n
82ALF/BU9nQNxqVnxZIdKFU=
=XIpw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to