Hello, On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 20:44 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Hi Adam (et al.), > > Sorry for not responding earlier but I've been travelling and quite > busy and completely forgot about this issue. As I said, I don't know > what the ideal situation is. The nice thing about the transition > package is that it provides some kind of upgrade path: it depends on > the package you need and has a NEWS entry telling you what to do. It > will work for most (easy) configurations. It will not work for > complex systems. I assumed the sys admins of such people would either > read the docs or could deal with breakage. But who knows. Maybe a > debconf message should be added; maybe the package should be removed > altogether. > > If you think you have a good solution, please talk to the stable > release manager and NMU this package at will.
Thanks, I'll produce a patch by next week and give this a try. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
