Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321314: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 20:04:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 13:04:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-255-034.arcor-ip.net (localhost) [82.83.255.34] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E0lxZ-000731-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:04:57 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id BC69AAD4003; Thu,  4 Aug 2005 22:04:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: epiphany-extensions: depends on unavailable libosp4
Tag: sid
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:04:56 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: epiphany-extensions
Version: 1.6.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hello,

epiphany-extensions depends on libosp4 (>= 1.5.1.0-1)
but libosp4 was removed from sid.

The name is now libosp4c2 (g++ transition).

A rebuild against the latest libosp-dev (1.5.1.0-3) should
fix this problem.

thx.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF-8)

Versions of packages epiphany-extensions depends on:
ii  epiphany-browser            1.6.4-1      Intuitive GNOME web browser
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.0.1-3    GCC support library
ii  libosp4                     1.5.1.0-2    Runtime library for OpenJade group
ii  sgml-data                   2.0.3        common SGML and XML data
ii  w3c-dtd-xhtml               1.1-5        W3C eXtensible HyperText Markup La

epiphany-extensions recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321314-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 02:42:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 19:42:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E32rj-0000mQ-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:19 -0700
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321314: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.4-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:32:19 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: epiphany-extensions
Source-Version: 1.6.4-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
epiphany-extensions, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.diff.gz
epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.dsc
epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated epiphany-extensions 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  8 Aug 2005 22:04:31 +0200
Source: epiphany-extensions
Binary: epiphany-extensions
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 epiphany-extensions - Extensions for Epiphany web browser
Closes: 321314
Changes: 
 epiphany-extensions (1.6.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bump libosp-dev Build-Dep to 1.5.1.0-2.1 for the C++ transition
     (closes: #321314).
Files: 
 9c2f6ead242b391a17a0bdf615ecff44 1887 gnome optional 
epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.dsc
 1e86897ba824876ffe69ce571f1a1f9c 2937 gnome optional 
epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2.diff.gz
 dc2461a8d7e588a3dcaf02cc634814a3 267488 gnome optional 
epiphany-extensions_1.6.4-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC+mqIJYSUupF6Il4RAjR6AKC2lPeH2a6ZT//rngRFSs9vp1AiaQCgrtO0
l0FKSw3H7ybqSl9/OmJxRUY=
=+hBO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to