severity 552576 important thanks On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:15:01AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > A missing standards version is a violation of a Should directive in > policy, and normally would be filed as important.
> Filed as serious, since a package with these files will currently get > this package rejected. See > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg00004.html > for details. This means the package has been deemed too buggy to be in > Debian. It has been deemed "too buggy to be in Debian" by the ftp team, who don't have the authority to make such determinations on their own. Downgrading this bug; I have requested that the ftp team remove these overreaching archive checks that have no basis in Policy's requirements, and intend to follow up with a GR if necessary. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
