On 2009-10-29 Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > These are not proper shared libraries but are dlopened bindings for > > guile, which takes them outside the scope of the abovementioned part of > > policy. > Then should they not be in a private path? This seems to be a project for guile-1.9. As Simon already noted using /usr/lib/ is current practice. > As long as they are > in the public library directories, you are still under the policy > directive, as far as I can see. Why? Shouldn't intent matter more than than binary format? Does running ldconfig provide any benefit? cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
