On 29/10/09 at 12:04 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > retitle 552860 FTBFS with glibc 2.10 > tag 552860 pending > thanks > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:39 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: checkinstall > > Version: 1.6.1-9 > > Severity: serious > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > amd64. > > > > Relevant part: > > > gcc -Wall -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPIC -fPIC -D_REENTRANT > > > -DVERSION=\"0.7.0beta5\" installwatch.c > > > installwatch.c:263: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'log' > > > installwatch.c: In function '__instw_printdirent64': > > > installwatch.c:886: warning: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', > > > but argument 4 has type '__ino64_t' > > > installwatch.c:886: warning: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', > > > but argument 5 has type '__off64_t' > > > installwatch.c: At top level: > > > installwatch.c:2835: error: conflicting types for 'scandir' > > > /usr/include/dirent.h:252: error: previous declaration of 'scandir' was > > > here > > > installwatch.c:3367: error: conflicting types for 'scandir64' > > > /usr/include/dirent.h:275: error: previous declaration of 'scandir64' was > > > here > > > make[3]: *** [installwatch.o] Error 1 > > This is a problem with the glibc 2.10. I knew this already because of an > ubuntu patch, but I see that the version info of glibc (and any > pre-installed stuff) is missing (which would have been helpful). Who > should I bug about this? sbuild, you, buildd admins? It should be easy > to add a dpkg -l before installing the build-dependencies.
sbuild, please, so it benefits both me and the buildds. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
