* Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> [091029 06:21]:
> In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE was defined.
> In eglibc 2.10, getline is always defined (since it became a standard in
> POSIX2008). The problem is that your package already has a function
> named getline(), which now conflicts with glibc's. You need to rename
> your function to something else.

Actually, the problem looks a bit more complicated. The getline in
question is a replacement for systems that have no getline, and should
only be compiled if the system has none. So there must be some problem
with the detection if there is such a function.

I'll investigate, thanks for your report,
        Bernhard R. Link
-- 
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
        Niklaus Wirth



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to