Your message dated Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321284: fixed in libatomic-ops 1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 16:57:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 09:57:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0j2M-0005ke-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:57:42 -0700
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1E0j2K-0002RF-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:57:40 +0200
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:57:40 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: libatomic-ops override disparity
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libatomic-ops
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:46:37AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:47:04AM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> > override file for the following file(s):
> >
> > libatomic-ops_1.0-1_i386.deb: package says section is libdevel, override
> > says libs.
>
> Hi,
>
> This package only contains static libraries (as requested by
> upstream), so I belive it fits best into libdevel.
You have a separate -dev package too... If you were to only have a
static version of the library (which I would strongly discourage, fwiw,
regardless of what upstream says, but still), there is no reason to have
two packages, everything could and should be in the -dev. Static
libraries belong in the -dev, not in the normal package[1]. Also, any
package depending on libatomic-ops will now break because the .so
simply disappeared. There is no such package in Debian, but still.
Also, you moved the static libraries without adding a proper Replaces:
field, breaking all upgrades.
I suggest dropping the libatomic-ops binary package, moving the .a's
back. You could add a replaces for people who managed to upgrade
regardless too.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-static
-- "It [static library (libraryname.a)] is placed into the development
package"
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321284-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 18:19:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 08 11:19:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2CBR-00068h-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:17:09 -0700
From: Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321284: fixed in libatomic-ops 1.0-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:17:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: libatomic-ops
Source-Version: 1.0-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libatomic-ops, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libatomic-ops-dev_1.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/liba/libatomic-ops/libatomic-ops-dev_1.0-2_i386.deb
libatomic-ops_1.0-2.dsc
to pool/main/liba/libatomic-ops/libatomic-ops_1.0-2.dsc
libatomic-ops_1.0-2.tar.gz
to pool/main/liba/libatomic-ops/libatomic-ops_1.0-2.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libatomic-ops package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:13:26 +1000
Source: libatomic-ops
Binary: libatomic-ops-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ian Wienand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libatomic-ops-dev - A library for atomic operations (development files)
Closes: 321284 321291
Changes:
libatomic-ops (1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Closes: bug#321284 -- we now only have the -dev package with the
static libraries in it, and it replaces the normal version (this
corrects an ahs3 thinko from 1.0-1).
* Add a note to README.Debian about staticness and license
* Add /doc subdir into package documents
* Closes: bug#321291 -- use "Q" constraint in
src/atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/x86.h for AO_test_and_set_full, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23242
* Reopening #307448 -- the asm needs to be reconsidered and possibly
rewritten for ARM.
Files:
40d8f60726c058c2b606160cdadc5061 555 - optional libatomic-ops_1.0-2.dsc
d3a65426c1f289d14230335a0e6fa648 188734 - optional libatomic-ops_1.0-2.tar.gz
cac0794a4de5d674f24107e4469d1a47 58160 libs optional
libatomic-ops-dev_1.0-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC958bso6+T7qY4V0RAm1wAJ9Z7maONit9fr1bgRmnzyaKZ4fNaACfWiRN
OKAYQymEYXp1XASZ73IwLrw=
=5UAo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
