Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:45:21 +0100
with message-id <1255776321.662008.12787.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package wipl has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #528120,
regarding wipl-client-java: contains non-free material
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
528120: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wipl-client-java
Version: 20020601-11.3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package includes the following files:
/usr/share/wipl-java/wiplJava.jar
which correspond to the following files in the source tarball:
wiplJava/wiplJava.jar
The source package does not include their source code. This goes
against the DFSG requirement that "the program must include source
code" therefore the package at present should not be in main. For this
package to remain in main the relevant source code should be found
and this package's source tarball should be repackaged to include it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 20020601-11.3+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/528120 in Debian BTS
against the package wipl. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/549213. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
