Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321747: fixed in estic 1.61-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 10:34:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 03:34:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c187147.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.187.147]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1iUS-0001ZA-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:34:48 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E1iUQ-0005TX-Ia; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:34:46 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: estic: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'ItemWindow' with no type
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 12:34:46 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: estic
Version: 1.61-15
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'estic' on unstable,
I get the following error:
itemwin.h:131: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'ItemWindow' with no type
itemwin.h:131: error: expected ';' before '*' token
itemwin.h:172: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'ItemWindow' with no type
itemwin.h:172: error: expected ';' before '*' token
itemwin.h:189: error: variable or field 'SetOwner' declared void
itemwin.h:189: error: 'WindowItem::SetOwner' declared as an 'inline' variable
itemwin.h:189: error: 'int WindowItem::SetOwner' is not a static member of
'class WindowItem'
itemwin.h:189: error: 'ItemWindow' was not declared in this scope
itemwin.h:189: error: 'aOwner' was not declared in this scope
itemwin.h:190: error: expected ',' or ';' before '{' token
itemwin.h:224: error: expected initializer before '*' token
listbox.h: In member function 'virtual void ListBox<T>::Draw()':
listbox.h:438: error: 'Owner' was not declared in this scope
filesel.cc: In member function 'virtual void FileListBox::Print(int, int, int,
u16)':
filesel.cc:157: error: 'Owner' was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [filesel.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/estic-1.61/spunk'
With the attached patch 'estic' can be compiled using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/estic-1.61/spunk/itemwin.h ./spunk/itemwin.h
--- ../tmp-orig/estic-1.61/spunk/itemwin.h 1999-12-26 14:44:17.000000000
+0000
+++ ./spunk/itemwin.h 2005-08-07 10:26:27.000000000 +0000
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
/* class WindowItem */
/*****************************************************************************/
-
+class ItemWindow;
class WindowItem : public Streamable {
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321747-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 20:55:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 13:55:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1s36-0005PA-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:47:12 -0700
From: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321747: fixed in estic 1.61-16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:47:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: estic
Source-Version: 1.61-16
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
estic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
estic_1.61-16.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/estic/estic_1.61-16.diff.gz
estic_1.61-16.dsc
to pool/main/e/estic/estic_1.61-16.dsc
estic_1.61-16_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/estic/estic_1.61-16_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated estic package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:31:46 +0200
Source: estic
Binary: estic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.61-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
estic - Administration program for ISDN PABX ISTEC 1003/1008
Closes: 321747
Changes:
estic (1.61-16) unstable; urgency=low
.
* small fix for gcc-4.0, thanks to Andreas Jochens, closes: #321747
Files:
7eba734013f5ab7981f39bdab13e3f6b 594 utils extra estic_1.61-16.dsc
f539cea72b06d6b3d17445874fbd138f 21244 utils extra estic_1.61-16.diff.gz
33dbb0c069642a2e936b47cbe2579ea4 311332 utils extra estic_1.61-16_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC9mTSfY3dicTPjsMRAqscAJwMbLtciHHkBiVG143MPcfe5zvMswCdHtn2
stajCliyPBKQ6uAYhhONnXI=
=8Ls/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
