Stéphane Glondu <st...@glondu.net> writes: > Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : >> I've prepared an NMU for monotone-viz (versioned as 1.0.1-1.1) and >> uploaded it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1. The patch renames >> some stub methods to avoid name clashes at (C) link-time with recent >> versions of lablgtk2. > > The current patch looks too much like a quick hack. > > Has upstream been notified? I believe the right way would be to fix > monotone-viz so that it uses lablgtk2's binding instead of having two > bindings of the same function. If monotone-viz doesn't use any more > binding that is not provided by lablgtk2, it should build pure bytecode > executables (without -custom) on bytecode architectures. > > Note: this is the first time I hear about monotone-viz...
Good suggestion. I'll forward the bug upstream and see whether there exists a newer upstream version that fixes the bug. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
