severity 534078 normal
retitle should not be built on archs other than i386
thanks
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 01:43:49PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> Darn straight: oaklisp is (at the moment) 32-bit only. A 64-bit port
> would be a major upstream undertaking.
Diminishing the severity then, since the package has always been
available on i386 only.
Still, you should probably fix the architecture of your package
accordingly and/or check whether it is mentioned in the
package-arch-specific list (I haven't checked). This way we will avoid
this (spurious) FTBFS bug reports in the future and that's why I haven't
closed the bug.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
