Your message dated Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:20:14 +0200
with message-id <4aadd28e.8080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#546396: Please mark this as invalid
has caused the Debian Bug report #546396,
regarding cl-clx-sbcl: fails to load
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
546396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546396
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cl-clx-sbcl
Version: 0.7.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I believe I've got the right package this time(oops).
Debugger output:
; /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-bsd-sockets/sb-bsd-sockets.asd into #<PACKAGE "ASDF0">
; registering #<SYSTEM SB-BSD-SOCKETS {ADCFAF1}> as SB-BSD-SOCKETS
; registering #<SYSTEM SB-BSD-SOCKETS-TESTS {AFCB1D9}> as SB-BSD-SOCKETS-TESTS

debugger invoked on a ASDF:MISSING-DEPENDENCY in thread #<THREAD "initial 
thread" RUNNING {AB168B9}>:
  component :CLX not found, required by #<SYSTEM "stumpwm" {B6437B1}>

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
  0: [RETRY   ] Retry loading component :CLX.
  1: [CONTINUE] Ignore runtime option --load "./make-image.lisp".
  2: [ABORT   ] Skip rest of --eval and --load options.
  3:            Skip to toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.
  4: [QUIT    ] Quit SBCL (calling #'QUIT, killing the process).

((LABELS ASDF::DO-ONE-DEP) ASDF:COMPILE-OP :CLX NIL)
0] 

other modules load, only clx fails of what I've tested. (CLisp is having a clx 
problem, too, but that's a built-in for that implementation, so my guess is 
it's a coincidence)
Same error on two different machines after yesterday's upgrades.


PS
Sorry about the clc bug report, jumped the gun there.
The fact that it was two implementations failing freaked me out. I should have 
calmed down and tested before reporting. Weird coincidence.
asdf can load cl-ppcre, so it's likely not asdf, either.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-0.slh.5-sidux-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages cl-clx-sbcl depends on:
ii  cl-asdf                     1:20090819-3 Another System Definition Facility
ii  common-lisp-controller      6.19         Common Lisp source and compiler ma

Versions of packages cl-clx-sbcl recommends:
ii  sbcl                        1:1.0.31.0-1 A Common Lisp compiler and develop

cl-clx-sbcl suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
gzeus wrote:
> it was my fault.

Ok, closing this bug.

Cheers

Luk


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to