Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> writes:
>> Running all tests listed in TESTS. If any tests fail, run the failing
>> test program with runtests -o to see more details.
>>
>> server/acl..............FAILED 28, 40
Those are really strange test failures, particularly to occur only on one
platform. They're both related to line 13 of tests/data/acl-simple, which
should be:
princ:expli...@example.com
The first test ensures that the principal listed is allowed and the second
ensures that if the file is listed in a deny rule, it's denied.
I've confirmed that remctl 2.14-4 still builds fine against unstable on
i386 and passes all of its tests, and there shouldn't be any
architecture-specific code involved in the ACL parsing code. I'm a bit
baffled. I realize I'm reaching here, but is there any way there's some
sort of file system corruption or a bad unpack of the source tarball going
on that modified that line of tests/data/acl-simple? Those are the only
two tests that reference that specific line of the file.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
