tag 527752 +patch
thanks

I'm considering NMU'ing this package with the following patch

--- libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/control
+++ libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/control
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 Conflicts: libcgicc1
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
 Description: A C++ class library for writing CGI applications
  An ANSI C++ compliant class library that greatly simplifies the creation of
  CGI applications for the World Wide Web. libcgicc performs the following
diff -u libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/changelog libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/changelog
--- libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/changeloglibcgicc: FTBFS: required file 
`support/ltmain.sh' not found
+++ libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libcgicc (3.2.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non maintainer upload to fix FTBFS
+    - relibtoolize on build and clean up afterwards (Closes: 527752)
+  * Add a comma to debian/control
+
+ -- Sune Vuorela <deb...@pusling.com>  Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:23:25 +0000
+
 libcgicc (3.2.7-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * New upstream release
diff -u libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/rules libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/rules
--- libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/rules
+++ libcgicc-3.2.7/debian/rules
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
   MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS)
 endif

+configure:
+       libtoolize -c -f
+       autoreconf

 config.status: configure
        dh_testdir
@@ -49,6 +52,13 @@

        # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
        [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) distclean
+
+       rm -f configure
+       rm -f cgicc/config.h.in
+       find . -name Makefile.in -delete
+       rm -f support/ltmain.sh
+       rm -rf m4
+       rm -f aclocal.m4

        dh_clean


Please advice me if I should reconsider.

In general, it looks like this package could need a bit of love.

/Sune
-- 
How to rename a shell of a memory?

You can't install the driver in order to insert the FPU.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to