Matthias Klose a écrit : > Package: binutils > Version: 2.19.51.20090827-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: help > > Regressions compared to 2.19.51.20090805-1 > > See: > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mips&stamp=1251415690&file=log > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1251398762&file=log > > Test results, compared with installed binutils: > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (sb1) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (octeon) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16-64 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16e save/restore > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc 2 > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 lui/addi > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32r2) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64r2) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (xlr) > W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32) > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 1 > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 2 > W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 interlinking > for > local functions 1 > 16 REGRESSIONS (1.05%). > >
While they are real regressions that have to be fixed, we don't have MIPS16 binaries in Debian, so I am not sure this bug should be considered as serious. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
