Your message dated Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:57:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 21:50:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 14:50:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DsSde-0005by-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:50:03 -0700
Received: from trofast.sesse.net ([129.241.93.32])
        by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DsSdc-0006DK-KS; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:50:01 +0200
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DsSdb-0001WX-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:49:59 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:49:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxine1
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

libxine1 can no longer be installed after upgrading to X.org, which makes
"aptitude dist-upgrade" on my system want to remove totem-xine, and thus
totem, and thus "gnome", and thus close to everything :-)

The dependency on "xlibmesa-glu | libglu" should be changed to
"libglu1-xorg | libglu1c2" and the package rebuilt, AFAIK.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libxine1 depends on:
ii  libasound2              1.0.9-3          ALSA library
ii  libc6                   2.3.5-1          GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfreetype6            2.1.10-1         FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libmodplug0             1:0.7-4          shared libraries for mod music bas
ii  libogg0                 1.1.2-1          Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libpng12-0              1.2.8rel-1       PNG library - runtime
ii  libspeex1               1.1.6-2          The Speex Speech Codec
ii  libstdc++5              1:3.3.6-7        The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtheora0              0.0.0.alpha4-1.1 The Theora Video Compression Codec
ii  libvorbis0a             1.1.0-1          The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libxext6                4.3.0.dfsg.1-14  X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]    4.3.0.dfsg.1-14  Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa-glu [libglu1]  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14  Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii  xlibs                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g                  1:1.2.2-7        compression library - runtime

Versions of packages libxine1 recommends:
ii  libmng1                  1.0.8-1         Multiple-image Network Graphics li
ii  libxv1                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System video extension li

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318019-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 08:57:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 01:57:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E0y1D-000152-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 01:57:31 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 8FCE4A3440; Fri,  5 Aug 2005 01:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 01:57:30 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libxine1: uninstallable due to g++ 4.0 transition
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since the C++ ABI transition was not actually necessary for libglu1 and has
consequently been reverted, this bug no longer applies; I believe it should
be closed.

I am preparing an NMU for the various build failure bugs that were reported
separately.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC8yn5KN6ufymYLloRApV8AKCDLQCmKf7Dz8jQajh8TVb/6GDtbgCgtqNW
OHu9X2f0+4z9MEOI7+G3jdQ=
=2Drv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to