Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > There appears to be something weird going on with hs-plugins. If you > check out debian/rules then there is a lot of logic for installing the > documentation (I don't understand why this is needed; can't we bring > the package into line?) into hs-plugins-doc.
the reason was that I wanted to avoid having to go through NEW. We have a lot of packages with a haskell-blubb-doc name as well... > Included amongst these files is the plugins.haddock file... you can > see where I'm going now - the new haskell-devscripts also installs the > same file into libghc6-plugins-dev. File conflict and uninstallable > packages abound. All build-depending packages fail to build because of > this, obviously. > > We have only gotten away with this in Debian because hs-plugins-doc is > arch:all and therefore hasn't been binNMUd - the next upload will > break. Ubuntu only accepts source uploads so the problem has cropped > up there. Very useful for us ;-) > What's the correct immediate fix for this problem? I've attached a > diff which I think solves it and uploaded this to Karmic, but I'd > appreciate peer review before committing to darcs. the diff looks fine. In fact, the code there in debian/rules was copied from haskell-devscripts, I guess you can copy from there again, to keep it in sync. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
