Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:16:51 +0100
with message-id <1250630211.078925.5287.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package gbuffy has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #515274,
regarding gbuffy: Depends on GTK 1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
515274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515274
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gbuffy
Severity: serious
gbuffy build-depends on libgtk1.2-dev, which will be removed for Squeeze.
Please port it to use GTK 2 or request it's removal.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gbuffy depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
pn libcompfaceg1 <none> (no description available)
ii libglib1.2ldbl 1.2.10-19 The GLib library of C routines
pn libgtk1.2 <none> (no description available)
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-15 SSL shared libraries
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxi6 2:1.1.4-1 X11 Input extension library
gbuffy recommends no packages.
gbuffy suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.2.6-13+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/515274 in Debian BTS
against the package gbuffy. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/539173. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
