On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:29:01PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Just out of curiosity, why would the sys admin change it in first place? if
How about a local change that makes one process need ldap or a database to get some data from while the default config doesn't do that? Or a software monitoring some other software? > the order needs to be modified then it might warrant a bug report, don't you > think? No, why? > Regarding preserving the modified order it seems impossible to me with the > current design of update-rc.d, but I'll leave that up to the maintainer. I don't understand this sorry. It did work before the insserv mess was introduced. Don't get me wrong, I actually like the dependency based approach quite a lot, it just has to work, which it unfortunately didn't for me. You might also want to see the policy that under 9.3.3.1 says: The system administrator will have the opportunity to customize runlevels by simply adding, moving, or removing the symbolic links in /etc/rcn.d if symbolic links are being used [...] I guess this alone warrants the RC status of this bug report. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: mes...@jabber.org Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
