Your message dated Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297943: fixed in usbmgr 1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 16:59:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 08:59:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6tfj-0005b3-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:59:35 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D6uc3-0003lf-4t; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:59:51 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: usbmgr: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:59:51 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: usbmgr
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'usbmgr' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
cc -DCONF_DIR=\"//etc/usbmgr\" -DCONF_FILE=\"usbmgr.conf\"
-DPRELOAD=\"preload.conf\" -DBIN_DIR=\"/usr/sbin\" -DVERSION=\"1.0.0\"
-DNETWORK_SCRIPT=\"network\" -DWAIT_FLUSH_PROC -O2 -Wall -I ./inc -c -o
node.o node.c
node.c: In function 'create_node_data_link':
node.c:34: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
make[1]: *** [node.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usbmgr-1.0.0'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'usbmgr' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/usbmgr-1.0.0/node.c ./node.c
--- ../tmp-orig/usbmgr-1.0.0/node.c 2001-01-04 16:14:53.000000000 +0100
+++ ./node.c 2005-03-03 18:53:02.099186014 +0100
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
INIT_NODE(np);
link_node(base,np);
if (size > 0) {
- (char *)np->data = (char *)(&(np->data)+1);
+ np->data = (char *)(&(np->data)+1);
memcpy((char *)np->data,(char *)data,size);
} else {
np->data = data;
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297943-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 23:55:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 02 16:55:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E06Tf-0007yK-00; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:47:19 -0700
From: Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#297943: fixed in usbmgr 1.0.0-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:47:19 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
Source: usbmgr
Source-Version: 1.0.0-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
usbmgr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
usbmgr_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/u/usbmgr/usbmgr_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
usbmgr_1.0.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/u/usbmgr/usbmgr_1.0.0-4.dsc
usbmgr_1.0.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/u/usbmgr/usbmgr_1.0.0-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated usbmgr package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:12:23 -0500
Source: usbmgr
Binary: usbmgr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
usbmgr - user-mode daemon which loads/unloads USB kernel modules
Closes: 239255 290677 296718 297943
Changes:
usbmgr (1.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Switched to cdbs for package building.
* Added patch to loader.c for proper handling SCSI subsystem when
kernel has CONFIG_SCSI set to Y and a mass storage device it's
plugged. (Closes: #239255)
* Added mention to hotplug and an advice explaining who might want to run
usbmgr instead of hotplug. (Closes: #290677)
* Applied patch on node.c to properly build on amd64, thanks to
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #297943)
* Changed priority to extra in favour of hotplug (Closes: #296718)
* Standards version update
* Improved support for 2.6 kernel modules, which names have changed.
Also add checking for kernel version on init script. So this will use
the usbmgr-2.6.conf config file.
Files:
b17c0683365bb48276be6b6ab13e9589 578 admin extra usbmgr_1.0.0-4.dsc
a0c5b8d8d8cde3557c0b2ba69a348257 18730 admin extra usbmgr_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
64b701baf1e515ae9a8d6b899a749142 49838 admin extra usbmgr_1.0.0-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC8AKpgY5NIXPNpFURAm7XAKCR/w5HOReqbnuajFCIssz+G6VICQCfXvMF
+PGXwSBZqBrsNYKKa9YZosc=
=uyCp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
