Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:12:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug already fixed, closing the report... (was Bug #319965: 
libboost-date-time1.33.0: bad shlibs file)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2005 00:22:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 25 17:22:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.64] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1DxDDD-0004mK-00; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:22:23 -0700
Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO 
tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net) ([208.58.77.33])
  by smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2005 20:22:22 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.95,141,1120449600"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="66259548:sNHT21562120"
Received: from amu by tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1DxDDB-0007tr-QT
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:22:21 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libboost-date-time1.33.0: bad shlibs file
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:22:21 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libboost-date-time1.33.0
Version: 1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050720-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6.3

libboost-date-time1.33.0 (like the other libboost*1.33.0 packages)
specifies a versioned dependency of 

    libboost-date-time1.33.0 (<< 1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050721)

in its shlibs file.  This doesn't actually work the way you'd like it
to, because dpkg parses that as upstream version 1.32.0+1.33.0, Debian
revision cvs20050721, and consequently *less* than any Debian revision
of upstream version 1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050720.  Adding a -0 to the
upper bound will remedy that.

In the future, using a second + before cvs should avoid this failure
mode; however, that will not work now without introducing an epoch,
because dpkg considers foo+bar-baz to come before foo-bar-baz.  (You
can verify this with dpkg --compare-versions.)

Packages such as monotone that got built against the broken
libboost*1.33.0 packages will need rebuilding against fixed versions.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libboost-date-time1.33.0 depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                     1:4.0.1-2    GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6                  4.0.1-2      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

libboost-date-time1.33.0 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 319965-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 21:12:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 14:12:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.netline.it) [217.19.149.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1DzL73-0000Ji-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 14:12:49 -0700
Received: (qmail 94304 invoked by uid 106); 31 Jul 2005 21:10:39 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.netline.it by uid 0 with 
qmail-scanner-1.22 
 (clamdscan: 0.73.  Clear:RC:0(82.50.145.158):. 
 Processed in 0.021909 secs); 31 Jul 2005 21:10:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO raptus.dandreoli.com) ([EMAIL 
PROTECTED]@82.50.145.158)
  by mail.netline.it with SMTP; 31 Jul 2005 21:10:39 -0000
Received: by raptus.dandreoli.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 839E3B24A; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:12:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:12:55 +0200
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug already fixed, closing the report... (was Bug #319965: 
libboost-date-time1.33.0: bad shlibs file)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

  this bug has been fixed in the latest Boost upload, version
1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050727-1 (the ugly saga continues...). I'm then
closing the report. Thank you.

cheers
domenico

-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to