Your message dated Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:57:59 +0200
with message-id <a90bfcf0907061357l839a7dei87d75591c17ed...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#520775: libdoxia-sitetools-java: Invalid Conflicts 
with  libdoxia-java
has caused the Debian Bug report #520775,
regarding libdoxia-sitetools-java: Invalid Conflicts with libdoxia-java
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
520775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520775
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdoxia-sitetools-java
Version: 1.0-alpha-11-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

libdoxia-sitetools-java is uninstallable in a sid chroot :

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libdoxia-sitetools-java: Conflicts: libdoxia-java (<= 1.0-alpha-7-1) but 1.0-
alpha-7-1 is to be installed
E: Broken packages

It seems release 1.0-alpha-11-2 from experimental should be uploaded to 
unstable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan<draz...@drazzib.com> wrote:
> It seems release 1.0-alpha-11-2 from experimental should be uploaded to
> unstable.

done.

Cheers,
Torsten


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to