On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Cyril Brulebois<k...@debian.org> wrote: > tag 521525 patch pending > thanks > > Daniel Schepler <schep...@math.berkeley.edu> (27/03/2009): >> ... >> : # Adding links to manpages >> mkdir -p debian/python-numpy/usr/share/man/man1 >> for v in 2.5 2.4; do \ >> ln -sf f2py.1 debian/python-numpy/usr/share/man/man1/f2py$v.1; \ >> ln -sf f2py.1 debian/python-numpy/usr/share/man/man1/f2py$v-dbg.1; >> \ >> done >> : # Add unversioned numpy script >> mv /tmp/buildd/python-numpy-1.2.1/debian/tmp//usr/bin/f2py >> /tmp/buildd/python- >> numpy-1.2.1/debian/tmp//usr/bin/f2py2.5 >> mv: cannot stat `/tmp/buildd/python-numpy-1.2.1/debian/tmp//usr/bin/f2py': >> No such file or directory >> make: *** [install/python-numpy] Error 1 >> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit >> status 2 > > I'm not quite sure why it was previously building fine, but since I can > reproduce it on the kfreebsd-* buildds as well as on amd64 sid chroots. > So instead of using a conditional mv (based on whether the file exists > or not), I'm deleting that line entirely. If the old behaviour shows up > again, I guess it'll be time to investigate. I'd bet for some possible > python-central change or whatever, and I'm not keen on spending time on > that instead of the maintainer(s?) who didn't reply in 3 months to an RC > bug. Also, debdiffing the old binaries and the rebuilt ones show no > changes at all, so I'm quite confident I'm not obviously breaking > something here.
Many thanks for fixing it! I apologize for not having time for this. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
