Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:14:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320594: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable 
lists closed ones as outstanding
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 14:13:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 07:13:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail3.hostpark.net [212.243.197.33] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dys5p-0007d8-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:13:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail3.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E3DFDD5
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail3.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP
 id 29160-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from twoflower.prv.korn.ch (84-72-120-140.dclient.hispeed.ch 
[84.72.120.140])
        by mail3.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C12F37F
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from turing.prv.korn.ch (turing.prv.korn.ch [192.168.1.78])
        by twoflower.prv.korn.ch (Postfix) with SMTP id 6845FA5E60D2;
        Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by turing.prv.korn.ch (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 
16:13:32 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable lists closed ones as
 outstanding
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:13:32 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hostpark.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi

Have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
This is what the form at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
came up with when I selected

search for: Paket "devtodo"
Flags: active
Distribution: unstable

now compare that to:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=devtodo
which is perfectly ok AFAICS.

This is probably the reason for the PTS keeping to bitch about patches
and showing an inflated bug count:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/devtodo.html

HTH, 2ri

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320594-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 03:16:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 20:14:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (epsilon.donarmstrong.com) [138.23.92.77] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dz4Hi-0003RM-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:14:42 -0700
Received: from archimedes.ucr.edu (archimedes.ucr.edu [138.23.92.79])
        by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with SMTP id 
j6V3EapS026285;
        Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:14:37 -0700
Received: (nullmailer pid 1165 invoked by uid 1000);
        Sun, 31 Jul 2005 03:14:35 -0000
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:14:35 -0700
From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#320594: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable 
lists closed ones as outstanding
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PkEWctFf+8E2rcii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--PkEWctFf+8E2rcii
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Have a look at:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=3Dpkg&data=3Ddevtodo&a=
rchive=3Dno&version=3D&dist=3Dunstable
> This is what the form at
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
> came up with when I selected
>=20
> search for: Paket "devtodo"
> Flags: active
> Distribution: unstable

Yes; this is quite correct; those bugs are still outstanding on some
architectures in unstable, namely hurd-i386:[1]

0.1.18-2: hurd-i386

If you restrict the view to a single architecture, say i386, you'll see the=
 following:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=3Ddevtodo&dist=3Dunstable&=
arch=3Di386

The header[2] correctly indicates that unstable has both 0.1.18-2 and 0.1.1=
9-2:

  Debian Bug report logs: package devtodo in unstable (versions 0.1.18-2, 0=
=2E1.19-1)

I hope that clarifies things for you.


Don Armstrong

1: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=3Dnames&v=
ersion=3Dall&exact=3D1&keywords=3Ddevtodo
2: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=3Ddevtodo&dist=3Dunstab=
le
--=20
There is no mechanical problem so difficult that it cannot be solved
by brute strength and ignorance.
 -- William's Law

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

--PkEWctFf+8E2rcii
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC7EIagcCJIoCND9ARArvpAJ4iuhTZX4XmGJGqgHP7A2eav3h/YACggilN
i7Ubp0F3mclom0EyUZDzbhg=
=kXlm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PkEWctFf+8E2rcii--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to