Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:48:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318677: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 23:37:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 16:37:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DtwDz-0000Rl-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:37:39 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6C508178541; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:37:37 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fox: unused library in testing/unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="48TaNjbzBVislYPb"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--48TaNjbzBVislYPb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: fox
Version: 1.0.52-2
Severity: serious
Rezound has been rebuilt against libfox1.2 after sarge's release, so the fox
package (libfox1.0) has no reverse-dependencies in the archive in either
testing or unstable. Unless you know of some other reason why this package
is still needed, I believe it should be removed from the archive now.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--48TaNjbzBVislYPb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC2ZomKN6ufymYLloRAst4AJ9GxmZYDDre4DLs5FkG5A8AAVyaDACgzaED
Tf0vS5n/2rABAAEVvISErpk=
=MbD/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--48TaNjbzBVislYPb--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 11:53:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 04:53:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jeroen by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyTLf-0001VR-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:48:19 -0700
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#318677: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:48:19 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
fox | 1.0.52-2 | source
libfox-doc | 1.0.52-2 | all
libfox1.0 | 1.0.52-2 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libfox1.0-dbg | 1.0.52-2 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libfox1.0-dev | 1.0.52-2 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
