On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:23:14PM +0200, Guido Trotter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing > > from the arch rather than spew a generic "unspported arch" message.
> Sorry, I didn't intend not to notify you (I thought the BTW sould have). > That said I don't believe this is RC, as LXC never was on those architectures. right, I missed that part. So this is indeed just important. > I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in the > meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which it > works? Can't we leave it "important" for now? Just following upstream isn't enough - upstreams' don't neccesarily care about all the archs debian supports. For example the unshare syscall which is one of the reason's that could cause the error message, is supported on arm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
