m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On May 15, Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwis...@avasys.jp> wrote:
>
>> few that I think warrant inclusion in an initrd. As a preventive
>> measure, would it not be a good idea to get such packages to provide an
>> initramfs-tools hook to do so themselves instead of udev doing it for
>> them?
> You should discuss this with the initramfs-tools maintainer, not me.
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev is the hook that pulls in all the
files below /etc/udev. This hook is part of the udev package, but yes,
any such change would require a bit of coordination.
> Anyway it would have been totally useless in this case since the boot
> process would just have stopped a bit later.
Understood, but it would at least have made an 'init=/bin/sh' type boot
possible. That, in turn, would have made cleaning up afterwards a good
deal easier.
Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS Corporation
FSF Associate Member #1962 Help support software freedom
http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=1962
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
