On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 04:11:20PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Adeodato Simó (Sun, 17 May 2009 11:21:06 +0200):
> > The problem is a bug in the packaging of pulseaudio itself, which > > doesn't specify in its Depends field that it needs the latest version of > > libpulse0 to run, despite linking to libpulsecommon-0.9.15.so. According > > to the Debian Policy, this is a serious bug. > (Assuming, of course, that libpulsecommon-0.9.15.so is some kind of > private library that only packages from the same source depend on/link > against, and that for this reason is okay to ship in libpulse0 and bump > its SONAME without a package rename.) It's a new library; I guess (hope) that it's a new API and therefore there are no backwards-incompatibilities that would require a package name change. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
