Jonas Smedegaard [2009-04-26 15:12 +0200]:
> Agreed, wsvn is bad.  There is also viewsvn which is better: 
> http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/build-common?view=rev&revision=341

Indeed, thanks!

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to