On Apr 25, Antonio Fiol <anto...@fiol.es> wrote:
> ATTR and an added ATTR{type}=="1"). If I understand this correctly, the
> "missing" ATTR{type} would match any ATTR{tpye} so it's not that. Then
> it must be that udev stopped understanding the SYSFS syntax ??
Interesting, SYSFS{} is supposed to be still supported.
Please check if rules like this work or not (remove the new ones):
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:0f:ea:3e:40:84", NAME="eth0"
s/SYSFS/ATTR/g in the user-generated rules files looks like a good idea
anyway, I need to write some code to do it.
> Also it might be related to the upstream change from from v135 to v136:
> "require non-SYSFS_DEPRECATED 2.6.20+ kernel". Since v129 (which I never
It is not.
On Apr 25, Yann Dirson <ydir...@altern.org> wrote:
> This looks the same as 521521, claimed fix in 0.140, but I'm running
But it is something totally different.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
