Package: ptlib Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Dear VoIP Team,
In the hope of speeding up and strenghtening the processing of the NEW queue I had a look at your package. The rationale is explained in the proposal in the following wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview I noted that the `licencecheck` tool from the `devscipts` pacakges finds some source files that are licenced under a BSD-style licence and that are not documented in debian/copyright. anx159《ptlib-2.4.2》$ licensecheck -r . | grep BSD ../src/ptlib/common/tinyjpeg.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptlib/common/tinyjpeg.cxx: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptlib/common/tinyjpeg-internal.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptlib/unix/udll.cxx: MPL (v1.0) MIT/X11 (BSD like) ../src/ptclib/udp.h: MIT/X11 (BSD like) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/misc.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/mdf.c: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/misc.c: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/arch.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/speex_echo.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/speex_preprocess.h: BSD (3 clause) ../src/ptclib/speex_echo/preprocess.c: BSD (3 clause) Since the administrators of our FTP archive are also using licensecheck, it is probably safer to re-upload a package with an updated copyright file to prevent rejection of your upload. This will not make ptilb go backwards in the queue. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
