Your message dated Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:45:55 +0100
with message-id <200904112245.n3bmjtrl012...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line wmi has been removed from Debian, closing #494663
has caused the Debian Bug report #494663,
regarding Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
494663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Severity: serious
Package: wmi
Version: 1:0.1.13-1
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This source package contains the following files from the IETF under
non-free license terms:
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/draft-armijo-ldap-syntax-00.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4533.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4530.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4531.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4518.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4519.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2696.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4524.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2307.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4516.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2849.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc3296.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4532.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4514.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4525.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4526.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4510.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4527.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4513.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4529.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4522.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc2891.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4523.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4517.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4515.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4528.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4520.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4512.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4511.txt
+ wmi-0.1.13/Samba/source/ldap_server/devdocs/rfc4521.txt
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
* http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
* http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
* http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
The lenny release policy says binary and source packages must each be free:
* http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt
The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy:
* http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg
There are (at least) three ways to fix this problem. In order of
preference:
1. Ask the author of the RFC to re-license the RFC under a free
license. A template for this e-mail request can be found at
http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments
2. Remove the non-free material from the source, e.g., by re-packaging
the upstream archive and adding 'dfsg' to the Debian package
version name.
3. Move the package to non-free.
General discussions are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal
or debian-devel in the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in
source packages".
Thanks,
Simon
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.1.13-1+rm
The wmi package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/523638 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
