On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 19:21 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > The keyword seems to be obscure interfaces. Also the extra argument of > xCheckReservedLock indicates that the underlying method is not changed > too much. It's only return that error code defined as a parameter. > It may be obscure, but it's an exported interface and it's being used by other software. It is unacceptable to make such changes without bumping SONAME.
> > We are going to rebuild evolution-data-server in unstable as to give a > > temporary fix to the issue. We don’t know if other applications are > > affected, and we should assess what permanent solution to give to this > > problem. > A local rebuild of evolution-data-server and evolution itself was > built; but not tested. BinNMU seems to be sufficient for this case. That's only sort of ok this time because evolution doesn't use sqlite in lenny. Really, sqlite upstream needs to be more careful with its ABI going forward. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
