severity 522108 important thanks On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Harry Haller wrote: > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable
I'd say that "important" is more appropriate here. Its description explicitly states it is "pre-release". > cruft: the result is nearly identical: masses of files are reported as > 'missing' although they exist (as far as I've checked it; mainly from > /etc, /usr/lib and /usr/share) and even much more files are reported as > 'unexplained' (also mainly from /etc, /usr/lib and /usr/share). I agree that a lot of filters are still missing, and the explain scripts also need a lot of work. Last time I checked, cruft reported no cruft for a minimal installation (as done by debootstrap). So it is usable right now for some people (who don't install many packages and take some effort to create filters for their systems). > I think, the correct working of cruft is really important for verifying > the consistence of a system I would really love for this to be true at some point. Sadly at this moment, for a real-world desktop installation, if cruft complains about something it is still more likely to be a missing filter in cruft rather than actual problem on the system. > therefore here my frst bug-report. Thanks for reading and eventually > working on it... Thanks for the report. Maybe you'll find some time to track down some of the erroneus reports and file more concrete bugs with patches to fix them in cruft? -- Marcin Owsiany <porri...@debian.org> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/ GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
