Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> Okay; I think it’s reasonable to wait, as long as we make sure it gets
> addressed at some point. Maybe we should open a separate bug report for
> it?

Feel free to do so if you like; usually, they're very responsive and I
expect an answer before the weekend. If the SONAME is not changed but
faked by a package name change, this is not mission-critical, is it?

Best regards
Manuel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to