Hi, Julien Blanc wrote: > In fact, i'm saying wrong version, because i would expect apt-get not to > install anything in this case (not migrating to 3.0 since there is a > dependancy breakage). This is what it does when installing, unfortunately not
There is no dependency breakage. The dependencies allow to make your situation happen, yes, so that's a bug in the dependencies, but the apt just sees the specified dependencies and the "solution" it found is "correct" given the dependencies (though not giving a working app of course). > I'm new to debian bug submitting, so i won't argue about ranking, although i > thought that running an upgrade and then having a broken app, might be > considered as "grave" (for information, i can confirm this behaviour on No, it's improper dependencies. Read what the bts says about this. > another machine running sid, i386). Of course. Simply because the i386 binaries do not exist yet. *Of course* the same problem will happen on anything which doesn't have 3.0.1 binaries in sid yet. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
