On 2009-02-18 16:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Sven Joachim a écrit : > > You are probably using an old kernel which has some problems. The buildd > is using a 2.6.26 kernel from lenny.
While my kernel may have some problems (not that I noticed any, but it's of course possible), it is not exactly old: ,---- | $ cat /proc/version | Linux version 2.6.28.6-amd64 (r...@turtle) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Tue Feb 17 20:03:14 CET 2009 `---- >> The official i386 buildd reported fewer failures but didn't work either: >> >> ,----[ >> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=glibc;ver=2.9-1;arch=i386;stamp=1234952645 >> ] >> | # >> | # Testsuite failures, someone should be working towards >> | # fixing these! They are listed here for the purpose of >> | # regression testing during builds. >> | # Format: <Failed test>, Error <Make error code> [(ignored)] >> | # >> | annexc.out, Error 1 (ignored) >> | check-localplt.out, Error 1 >> | testgrp.out, Error 1 >> | tst-cancelx4.out, Error 1 >> | tst-cancelx5.out, Error 1 >> | tst-cpuclock2.out, Error 1 >> | *************** >> | Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures: >> | tst-cpuclock2.out, Error 1 >> `---- > > This is because it uses cpufreq with the ondemand governor. This test is > being ignored in the latest SVN. Good to hear. Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
