reopen 234863 tags 234863 +sarge thanks Hola Helge Kreutzmann!
> Hello,
> I have no idea why you are so keen to close these bugs. Woody is
> supported (at least security wise) for well into next year,
Well, my idea was to only close non-security bugs.
Because woody is not supported for non-security problems.
Also, it's Evolution. It doesn't make much sense for people to keep using
it, since it's really buggy, there's no upstream support, neither is there
going to be any Debian support, except for security related problems.
Finally, I'm keen on closing these bugs, because it's really difficult to
find the bugs that actually need fixing, given that only the bugs in sid
are going to be taken care of.
> might still run into these issues. It is even good if they are still
> in the BTS, because then you can tell them: solved already in Sarge,
> did you not check the BTS? People might report them again, btw.
People get annoyed at the amount of bugs listed in evolution. Finding a bug
is almost impossible, and we get an awful amount of duplicates because of
that.
> And please *read* the bugs before you close them. 234863 actually
> discusses sarge issues as well, though as I don't use evolution myself
> I have no idea if this is still relevant.
Ok, point taken. I had read most of the bugs in the past, and I actually
tagged "woody" most of them, so I assumed that they were all correctly
marked woody. I'm reopening it now.
--
Bessos,
Maggie.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
