On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:29:36AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:18:49AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > Two approaches to resolve this have been proposed:
> > >
> > > As far as I know, there should be patches in Ubuntu to build some of
> > > the packages you listed against xulrunner 1.9; I guess that would be
> > > the best solution. I'm not sure icedove / xulrunner 1.8 will be
> > > maintainable for a long period.
> > >
> > > I also wonder whether mozilla-bonobo can be dropped.
> >
> > After a bit more investigation it appears as if solution (2)
> > won't work, since iceape-dev itself depends on iceape-browser.
>
> Do you mean depends as in debian/control, or as in dropping the
> package dependency doesn't work?
As in debian/control:
Package: iceape-dev
[..]
Depends: iceape-browser (>= 1.1.14), iceape-browser (<= 1.1.14-1.1~),
iceape-dev-bin (>= 1.1.14), libnspr4-dev
Or is the dependency not technically needed for the use cases, which
remain in the archive?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
