Colin Watson wrote: > Joey, what do you think of this? I'd rather not add a new database > unilaterally.
I don't like special casing ucf in debconf. I suppose we could add a Sensative: true field and filter questions with that set to a separate database. I think I prefer the approach of ucf ensuring the data is cleared out of debconf before it has a chance to store it to disk. The only risk in that approach is that it's possible to write a DbDriver that stores the data after every set, rather than at the end -- but none of the existing ones do. Changing ucf seems like the quickest fix also. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
