On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:45:07PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Robert Millan writes ("Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
> answer from Citrix & Xen.org"):
> > This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our
> > set of Debian-specific changes to the package would have been a non-issue,
> > or at least a minor one.
>
> I disagree.
>
> The people responsible for these decisions in Ubuntu didn't worry
> about the non-freeness of the logo. Ubuntu would have been happy to
> use the non-free logo. When I was involved in the `negotiations' with
> Mozilla, as a Canonical employee, the logo was not the issue.
Which explains why those negotiations were succesful.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
