Loïc Minier <l...@dooz.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> instead of bloating the dependency graph, I'd rather suggest to drop the
>> *.la files from libjack-dev instead. This of course breaks static
>> linking against libjack, but we don't want that anyway.
>
>  When dropping the *.la files you might break rdeps of libjack dev
>  packages (if *.la files of libs in other packages reference jack's *.la
>  files, they will break builds against these libs), it's best to check
>  all rdeps of libjack-dev packages (recursively  :-/) for la files
>  referencing jack's, or to simply strip jack's la file.

It seems that only bio2jack is affected here. Wouldn't a binNMU fix
that?

>  See e.g. /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/clean-la.mk for a way to do
>  this with CDBS (in gnome-pkg-tools).
>
>  It's basically:
>     sed -i "/dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/" debian/.../usr/lib/*.la

sounds reasonable.

How about uploading that to testing-proposed-upload, and dropping the
.la file in unstable? Because of the SONAME bump, we need 2 uploads
anyways...

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to