--On 02. Jänner 2009 03:37:51 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote:
> Paul Cupis <p...@cupis.co.uk> (20/11/2008): >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:20:22PM +0100, Friedemann Stoyan wrote: >> > I run into the same trouble, quagga 0.99.10-1 is completely unusable >> > for me. I compiled quagga source 0.99.11-1 from unstable for lenny. >> > This version fixes the bug. Please unblock quagga 0.99.11-1. >> >> Upstream are considering dumping 0.99.11 due to a bug in the OSPF code >> - 0.99.12 is due to be released in the coming weeks with the fix (or >> can be patched etc). > > Hello, > > I'm wondering what to do with quagga for that bug WRT lenny. The diff > between .10 and .11 is *huge*¹. Would a backport of the specific patch > (as the one proposed by Hannes Schulz) for lenny be acceptable for a > t-p-u upload? > > ¹: 206 files changed, 5133 insertions(+), 25909 deletions(-) according > to a diffstat on a source debdiff. > > Hannes, did you contact upstream asking whether your patch would be > suitable on top of .10? If you didn't, could you please do so, and point > to the first mail of the thread by replying to the Debian bugreport, so > that one can easily track it? > > Thanks for your time! > If I recall correctly, Stephen Hemminger wanted to move on to somthing completely different. Yours Hannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
