On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 08:55:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 07:57:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Neil McGovern wrote: > > >>> A 30 second peek into the rules files shows that there's even a > > >>> configure option to disable SSL support... > > >>> > > >> It also seems to be gtk1.2, which was the other reason for removal. I'm > > >> not sure that the requirement to bring in gtk1.2 helps the case for a > > >> lightweight browser, especially as we're trying to remove gtk1. > > > > > > Noone's trying to deprecate gtk1.2 for Lenny and for Squeeze the gtk2 > > > based > > > version can be uploaded. > > > > There were several efforts to reduce the dependency on gtk1.2, it's only > > unfortunate that most people were not convinced that we really wanted to > > get rid of gtk1.2 otherwise it would already have happened. > > I'm fully aware of that, actually I was involved in getting GTK1.2 removed. > But it's not a valid argument against dropping Dillo at this point. >
Apologies, I may not have made it clear: I don't consider a browser without ssl support to be well featured enough for us. We've finally removed the rest of the ones that don't support it, and I'm not keen to introduce another. If you can fix this bug, then I'll look at reintroducing it. Thanks, Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
