On 30/12/08 14:25, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Your target kernel (2.6.26) is not from Debian Stable, cloop-src is. Do the math.
I find your reply rather rude. I take the time to report Debian bugs so that the overall quality of Debian can be improved. This kind of comment, "do the math", does not encourage me.
cloop-src 2.05~20060829-1.2 is in testing and unstable. This is the version I was trying to build, and is the version I reported. The version of cloop-src in stable is 2.04-1+eb.1-7. See http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=cloop&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
Visit http://debian-knoppix.alioth.debian.org/ for more recent upstream package, or take the one from Debian Unstable.
I am running a pure Testing system. If a kernel module package is in the Testing repo, I expect it to build on a Testing system. I should not have to go fetching sources from somewhere else. If you don't intend for people to use it on Testing, take it out of the repo. However, it would be better to upgrade the Unstable loop-src to the new upstream version, which has been needed for over a year now, according to bug #436090.
Although I haven't tried this on Unstable, I very much expect it will produce the same result, since the cloop-src version is the same there, and so is the kernel version. So I consider this to be a bug in Unstable too.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
