On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 02:15:22PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > immediately after I sent the last mail, Sune Vuorela pointed me to > apache2's fix for #390823: They simply remove the problematic maintainer > script. > The question then is where to do this in so it is reliably done before > stuff happens. > In one of the perl packages (because the upgrade of perl triggers this) > is probably too ugly, maybe the configure script of ghostscript?
I think it's too late to do it inside ghostscript, it would have to go in perl-modules. Not sure if the case where perl-base is upgraded first and perl-modules lacks behind is just theoretical, but it would create the same effect. It would mean we'd need the hack in perl-base too. I'm obviously not thrilled by this ugliness, but it's doable. Thomas, thanks for driving this. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
