On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 07:06:04PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Hmhm yes that looks spurious. It's weird nobody noticed this before, > because it should break in many situations…
It's possible that it does break here due to subshell usage. Maybe adding `-o $$' to pidof calls would help to catch another case, as the invocation of pidof already tries to leave the parent out, but maybe it misses some processes on the chain. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stable Release Manager `- finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
