Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:51:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316453: found a "not-so-bad" solution
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2005 06:10:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 23:10:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoEj0-0004Gl-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:10:06 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so241229wra
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=O2QJtb1paM+ruHjw8zoZ0NMbX62eIPN7dRAYpUNfWCtBaSqWTYs+ndedkAVYOLg7LrVBxBHdMOXWfhvj+FJaOFlWjevt5WfAUkHvmIQxvpY8tY3ces1IbAzZfVK+2fHFOtYft0B3YzRP9+xnJKb2ECbl8SRnzU+3Yrvx1yqCG+M=
Received: by 10.54.16.30 with SMTP id 30mr1144539wrp;
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.96.17 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 02:10:04 -0400
From: Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
(Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against
kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic).
Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
boot.
The first error message says something like:
" Can't load shared object file libc.so.6 "
The second error message says it can't find sda1.
My hypothesis is that the necessary modules for my onboard SATA
controller are no longer included in the initrd image.
I HAVEN'T modified /etc/mkinitrd/mkinitrd.conf.
I've a pretty common Asus K8V-X motherboard which SATA ctrler
requires at least scsi_mod, sata_via and libata to work.
Booting with the current kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64-generic image works fine.
I'm happy i kept my very old image before upgrading 2.6.11!!
-Pascal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_CA, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_CA (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316453-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2005 00:52:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 17:52:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DrmWf-0001xU-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:52:01 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so751016wra
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=PL78asfusm9MYqqW3kiMR5vt+wbToNLecF0ytkFWQLnuU1Lrgwcpjl6qvNAzovAJChVnP/hL79oJXRJSmIWyWqPyp+IVWAwlfhD7Ckqd8lfl2sDySCeoiwDXDai5mUzdA7oQ/qs/vAZk5luHGiy7cyHvc64ghGh+EN24KGK2giA=
Received: by 10.54.141.1 with SMTP id o1mr3562624wrd;
Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.102.20 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 17:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:51:30 -0400
From: Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#316453: found a "not-so-bad" solution
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Ok, so a proper /etc/ld.so.conf fixes my issue.
Since i can't remember if i autokilled myself on this one (bad modif),
i see no reason to leave this bug open.
thanks to everyone who helped!
-Pascal
--=20
XBGM# (http://xbgm.sf.net)
MoviXMaker-2 (http://sv.gnu.org/projects/movixmaker)
[e]MoviX[2] (http://movix.sf.net)
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
