Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:49:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317603: fixed in tla 1.3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 04:08:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 09 21:08:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DrT6q-0001zC-00; Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:08:04 -0700
Received: from c-24-147-127-19.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.127.19] 
helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu)
        by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DrT6p-000874-4C
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:08:03 -0400
Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1DrT6m-0000Ck-Pf
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:08:00 -0400
From: Chris Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tla: dependency libneon25 not in main
X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:08:00 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tla
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious

tla 1.3.3-1 isn't installable because libneon25 is in experimental.

Please re-upload with appropriate dependencies.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (1200, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2-cph2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages tla depends on:
ii  diff                       2.8.1-11      File comparison utilities
ii  gawk                       1:3.1.4-2     GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii  libc6                      2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libneon24                  0.24.7.dfsg-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii  patch                      2.5.9-2       Apply a diff file to an original

tla recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 317603-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 19:54:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 12:54:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DrhsF-0006ji-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:54:00 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Drho3-0003VB-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:49:39 -0400
From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317603: fixed in tla 1.3.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:49:39 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tla
Source-Version: 1.3.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tla, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tla-doc_1.3.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tla/tla-doc_1.3.3-2_all.deb
tla_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tla/tla_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
tla_1.3.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tla/tla_1.3.3-2.dsc
tla_1.3.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tla/tla_1.3.3-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tla package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:56:17 +0100
Source: tla
Binary: tla-doc tla
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.3.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 tla        - arch revision control system
 tla-doc    - revision control system (documentation)
Closes: 317603
Changes: 
 tla (1.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Back out bogus change to libneon25; that wasn't supposed to hit sid yet
     (closes: #317603)
Files: 
 7cd2d2bb4b995acb78fec0afd965a160 576 devel optional tla_1.3.3-2.dsc
 52c5a0c74a098b66e7561599b9c877c0 10576 devel optional tla_1.3.3-2.diff.gz
 af1a93b9c20f3a758f641e4a4a39eb77 50188 devel optional tla-doc_1.3.3-2_all.deb
 63691aa1f3c5c79b52d2d45478dd734d 283188 devel optional tla_1.3.3-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC0XbLlpK98RSteX8RAthtAKCHHUSDbn+9hSvNZhkcQv8srrd/xACeLJM8
HGM1XVq3XnRvLUwYrAXT2KI=
=sACg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to